Sight Unseen

A blind expat's musings on life, death and the Trump era

99 posts and counting

My name is Christopher Winner. I am an American citizen who has lived in Europe, predominantly Rome, for nearly half a century, and I founded The American | In Italia in 2004. I also began a column titled “Area 51,” which exists to this day. But, in 2015, I was diagnosed with glaucoma and have gradually lost my sight. The thoughts and comments you read below are snippets of my thinking in these challenging times and are dictated to co-managing editor Leigh Smith. See also my personal website.

Christopher P. Winner • April 26, 2026 at 7:29 pm

Emperor of America: The American president is the rarest of birds of prey. He detests much of the non–Anglo-Saxon world, one he has never shown much interest in understanding, but since the start of his second term, he has nonetheless intervened in half-a-dozen nations on behalf of his vision of war and peace. This makes him the most quixotic of isolationists and the first modern American leader to rule through cult of personality. He is anti-intellectual, luxurious but lacking in style, and especially adept at the art of retribution; the notion of consensus-building is, to him, alien and a deplorable sign of weakness. This in effect means the world is no longer dealing with the United States of America but instead with a thin-skinned New York real estate tycoon who happens to be president. Those who refuse to abide by boardroom orders are punished, not by the United States but by the tycoon. An America that once reflected a lofty if imperfect value system has been hijacked by an interloper who indulges personal, not national, preferences and priorities — profoundly insecure, he subsists on gut-level impulses and advice from his hand-picked coterie of insiders. Personality cult leaders have always depended on actions that call constant attention to themselves. By virtue of living and working in a rarefied society of yes-men, they are literally isolated. Consequently, nations not named America must be demeaned or threatened to acquire any real standing. Two centuries ago, a short and insecure military commander was not satisfied simply by being hailed as ruler of France. He demanded an emperor’s consecration. Behold a president who seeks the same.

Christopher P. Winner • April 25, 2026 at 8:39 pm

Rotten to the core: I will be mercifully brief. News that members of this White House as well as American soldiers have used privileged information about foreign policy to place winning bets and play the stock market to their advantage reflects both a national addiction to online gambling and an almost cavalier attitude toward corruption that together cast a shadow not only on a mendacious president but on all who serve him. Before America’s immovable partisan divide, such allegations would have brought Congress to attention. But as it is now, the only congressional bipartisanship regards the Epstein scandal. This president has spent much of his second term posting insults to social media, with the Obamas as apes, India as a hellhole, Europe in the throes of civilizational erasure — hate upon hate, bigotry upon bigotry, vicious ignorance enough to fill all the space from sea to shining sea, and well beyond. If Americans otherwise estranged from political goings-on want a true sense of civilizational erasure, they need only crack open their windows. The stench will do the rest.

Christopher P. Winner • April 22, 2026 at 12:30 pm

Rising sun: Douglas MacArthur will likely soon be forced to roll over in his grave, not once but several times. He is the five-star American general who, at home in Tokyo, turned postwar Japan from a nationalistic, militaristic state into a thriving democratic one that constitutionally renounced war and used technological ingenuity to rebuild, for decades a highly successful move — think Sony, think Honda, think Toyota, the list is long. Now, an aggressive new female prime minister, Sanae Takaichi, seems ready to rethink Japan along the lines of America’s openly war-oriented president. She wants to liquidate Tokyo’s longstanding ban on military exports so the country can make quick cash from sophisticated-weapons sales to nations that have fallen out of favor with Washington. She also wishes to eliminate a constitutional ban on war that was largely MacArthur’s brainchild. In essence, Japan intends to fully rearm after decades of dependence on the United States. This of course will not please archrival China and means Tokyo will very likely resist any effort by Beijing to make Taiwan its own. Boiled down to its essence, Japan and China seem on a collision course that has the potential to plunge the entire Pacific Rim into incendiary chaos. MacArthur acted as he did specifically to avert any future trouble between these historic enemies. But just as the United Nations has been set aside, so has the MacArthur legacy. And for all this we have a would-be napoleonic president to thank.

Christopher P. Winner • April 19, 2026 at 9:03 pm

Pope v. President: There has lately been tension between the American president and the American pope, Leo XIV, who at the moment is traveling in Africa, which along with Asia and the Americas, now represents the Catholic church’s most fertile terrain. It is a church that, since the papacy of John Paul II, has largely turned away from Europe and North America, preferring to address the hundreds of millions of faithful in the developing world. John Paul was a legendary presence who enjoyed mingling with the poor and the dispossessed. He felt at home in African countries and, away from St. Peter’s, argued vigorously for the right to freedom from oppression, from any hindrance to worship freely, and from systems of government disdainful of individual dignity. Leo is doing no more than following in his footsteps, albeit more carefully, which is why his spat with the White House occupant has drawn less mainstream attention in Rome than in Washington. My friends who once covered the Vatican — as did I briefly — all say the same thing. That the Chicago-born Leo is shocked by this president’s gratuitous vulgarity and indifference to basic morality, whether by making war, reveling in deportations, or stripping charities and aid agencies of vital American support. My friend Paolo, who knew Leo as a cardinal, says the pontiff finds the American president shameful, as did his predecessor, Pope Francis, in his final years. The churchman and the billionaire exchange what might be called verbal glares, because, simply put, they dislike each other, and since the American president (who has portrayed himself as Jesus on social media) demands veneration, there is not nor can there be true common ground. One is a disciple of dignity, the other has no notion of what the word means. Adds Paolo, now 85, “Leo believes the president worships but one, himself,” and, absent humility, there can be no respect. Enough said.

Christopher P. Winner • April 16, 2026 at 12:52 pm

Dirty words: In the year 2000, when I was living in Prague, a woman I came to know introduced me to her grandfather, a pie-faced man well into his 80s who told me that during the Nazi occupation he had reluctantly served in the city’s law courts. This experience had marred his life, and he was now glad, he said, to be in the presence of a “good” American, as it was our efforts that slayed Nazism and later helped eliminate Communist rule. In flawless English, he recollected his law clerk days in 1941. Daily, dozens of citizens, mostly Jews, were summarily tried and convicted. Sometimes the offenses were absurd, perhaps walking down a certain street that was barred to Jews or trying to rescue a pet cat that had jumped on the fender of a military truck. Most all were given immediate death sentences and hanged in gallows located in the building’s courtyard. Others were guillotined in an abandoned tannery nearby. He remembered repeatedly having to pen the words “exterminated,” “eliminated,” and “extinguished” in his legal ledger. Those days left him so vacant in spirit that he spent many postwar years ambling through the local countryside and collecting grasshoppers whose delicate frames he preserved in cataloged jars. Now, nearly a century after those bleak Occupation days, it is the Jews of Israel and the “good” Americans who speak of extermination, since the hard-line leaders of Iran are portrayed as ugly specimens who very literally should not exist. Astonishingly enough, since both men were brought up in the immediate post-war, neither the American president nor his Israeli counterpart seem cognizant of the Nazi-era diction they apply almost daily. The Nazis rationalized their Prague law courts by saying they sought to re-order a contaminated city. Unwittingly, perhaps, America and Israel are providing similar rationalizations. As my friend’s grandfather said, “May God have mercy on me for those times.” That same God is now being asked to extend His mercy. There is no telling if He will.

Christopher P. Winner • April 14, 2026 at 9:51 pm

Orbán’s end: For sixteen years, Hungary’s Viktor Orbán was the European Union’s most accomplished chameleon. His expedient shifts from right to center and back to right — his true home — caused havoc in the EU. He vetoed budgets and forged a friendship with Vladimir Putin when no other states would touch him. He then morphed into an apologist for the Ukraine war. Until recently, his constituency admired him as a shrewd nationalist. All that has now ended with a landslide election defeat in which his party effectively lost control of the country to a younger, center-right candidate named Péter Magyar. Orbán’s mystique had been fading, true, but few expected this slaughter. The why is simple enough. The far right that used to serve Orbán so well suddenly became home to a troubling, Big-Stick American president as well as the dwelling place of the Israeli prime minister, a man Orbán severed ties with the International Criminal Court to host. Putin was one thing, but Orbán was now in league with a new and surprising duo of devils, neither one a political admirer of the EU, and this is to put it mildly. Hungary was also grappling with its own economic problems as well as allegations of widespread corruption. Enough was enough, and Orbán was gone in a day, American endorsements made useless since this United States more resembles the old Kremlin than anything traditionally American. What next? Probably closer ties with Brussels and a distancing from both the us and Israeli leadership. Orbán, a masterful Sisyphus, was a marvel at pushing even the most improbable rocks up steep inclines, only to step aside when they began to roll back toward him. Finally, he was not able to get out of the way.

Christopher P. Winner • April 12, 2026 at 10:26 pm

Israel 2.0: It is an unfortunate accident of history that the United States and Israel, inseparable allies, would at the same time be led by governments of the extreme right, each inclined toward 1930s militarism. The campaign against Iran was only in part motivated by fears that Islamic nation was close to developing a nuclear weapon. The second component, just as vital, was to sever the umbilical cord between Tehran and its major terrorist proxies, Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza. This Israeli leadership is unlike its more open-minded predecessors. It seeks not only full control of Gaza, but also as much of Lebanon as it can secure, both stepping stones toward a vibrant Greater Israel, no Palestinian state in the mix. Nor are civilian casualties of any special concern. Here is Israel’s version of Manifest Destiny, a concept to which the American president can relate. An expanded and unimpeded Jewish state dealing freely with its rich Arab neighbors (Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, and Kuwait, among others) would represent an unrivaled commercial and political juggernaut. For this reason it has no intention of curbing its military moves in Lebanon, which makes enduring peace with Iran hard to imagine. These times have the flavor of a Judeo-Christian jihad, though both Israel and the U.S. would find such a parallel profoundly objectionable. Yet it is, without doubt, one extremism pitted against another, with the biblical nation-builders holding the upper hand.

Christopher P. Winner • April 09, 2026 at 7:32 pm

The talented Mr. Vance: A certain Mr. J.D. Vance can at times surpass his master in the rhetoric of unpleasantness. Last year, he so infuriated European leaders that they made it clear they would no longer deal with him. He has lately been replaced at summits by Marco Rubio, the Secretary of State. But now the young ruffian is back, this time, to meddle in Hungarian affairs, throwing his and his boss’ support behind Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, who is trailing in opinion polls ahead of Sunday elections. Orbán is pals with a man named Putin and, like young Vance, takes pleasure in tossing verbal grenades at the European Union. Vance has also weighed in on the Iranian ceasefire deal, naturally insisting America won a beloved and unquestioned victory. Bear in mind, please, that this is the man who may run for president in 2028, assuming this incumbent chooses to step aside. Vance is an all-too-lucid reactionary who revels in supporting the unsupportable, including Israel’s self-aggrandizing operations in Lebanon, which are gradually rivaling Gaza’s in scope. He is frightening because he exudes a lethal mix of confidence, arrogance, and ignorance, much like his president. Worst of all, given America’s partisan divisions, he may represent the American future. All of this to say, trouble lurks even outside the dis-Ovaled White House.

Christopher P. Winner • April 08, 2026 at 9:47 pm

Stockholm in Iran: Ceasefire aside, when the leader of a nation such as the United States threatens to eradicate an ancient civilization, those sentiments, once they make the public rounds, cut deeply into the way citizens are inclined to view would-be liberators. So deeply, in fact, that opponents of an oppressive regime can suddenly place national pride ahead of domestic discontent, a kind of in-house Stockholm syndrome brought into being by a loose-lipped and at times lunatic president. Those Iranians who at first welcomed a possible change in government may come to see those who bombed them for more than a month not as saviors but as raiders alone. The U.S. and Israel may claim to have won this war, or won a ceasefire, but they have no notion of the disillusionment they have inflicted on the people they sought to redeem. If the Iranian masses now behave more gingerly toward those who would “rescue” them, this will be the cause. A pummeled regime that was not supposed to have survived has apparently done just that, and in so doing perhaps retrieved a Stockholm syndrome–like reprieve from a restive population.

Christopher P. Winner • April 08, 2026 at 1:28 am

Shame: Whatever transpires in Iran in the coming days, the American president’s obscene warnings about ending a civilization have diminished if not obliterated a once universally respected office and perhaps shattered beyond repair a vision of a country long admired for its dedication to an ideal of decency. Some may excuse this as back-alley bluster or boardroom vulgarity. But previous presidents knew to check their rantings at the door out of deference to basic public decorum. This man and his cohorts, American jihadists of a sort, eschew such restraint and composure, leaving these United States of America in a gutter no washing will later rob of its stink. I am for the first time in more than 50 adult years ashamed to call myself American, a feeling made all the worse knowing a fair number of my compatriots admire this stench because, in their view, truth is by nature vulgar and better brutal bluntness than what they consider political double-talk. Shame on them, shame on America, shame on any sense of First-ness, shame on electing a convicted felon to the White House, a place his arrogance may keep him from leaving in two years’ time so that the only civilization at risk is our own.

Christopher P. Winner • April 07, 2026 at 1:49 am

Apollo 8: The first lunar orbital mission came nearly 60 years ago, in 1968, and briefly calmed a planet in chaos. I was 15 at the time, and there was no Internet, no mobile phones, and global news was broadcast only once daily. It was an election year. In a broken South, George Wallace emerged as an unrepentant segregationist candidate. In the space of three months, the leading Civil Rights activist, Martin Luther King Jr., and the most outspoken critic of the Vietnam War, Robert F. Kennedy, were shot dead. As north Vietnamese troops pressed on with a devastating offensive, President Lyndon Johnson announced he would not seek reelection. With hundreds of weekly deaths and despite the presence of half-a-million American troops, the United States was losing the war, or so said the respected CBS anchorman Walter Cronkite. In Paris, students joined workers in massive anti-government demonstrations that seemed on the verge of overturning the existing social and political order. Cold War tensions were also high. In August, the Soviet Union invaded Czechoslovakia to quash a pro-democracy movement and warned the west against any interference.

The Democratic party’s political convention saw pitched battles between hardline police and radical protesters. Hundreds were arrested, and Chicago Mayor Richard J. Daley as well as FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover spoke of sedition. In November, Richard Nixon was elected president, saying he spoke for the “silent majority” just as this president speaks for a malignant minority of one.

I mention these events to bring into sharper relief what the three NASA astronauts accomplished during their mission. In scratchy voices heard around the world —there were no video links at the time — they read passages from the Book of Genesis. It was near Christmas and, for the first time in that chilling year, the world felt a sense of peace, harmony, and hopeful humanity. It was as if these three men speaking from so far away had reached the suburbs of the universe, making the interstellar city beyond inevitable. Would that this new group of lunar astronauts could transmit something of the same sentiment, but that seems unlikely in a world fractured beyond even Genesis’ ability to heal.

Christopher P. Winner • April 06, 2026 at 1:38 am

Hellfire: American evangelicals have a crush on this president. Though often profane, he speaks in the simplistic way of born-again sermons and likes conjuring visions of hellfire. His is childlike language, suited to comic-book bubbles and picturebook readers, wherein he tells us who is good, who is bad, and who has been nice to him. Those who have not been nice are morons, idiots, or low-IQ individuals, whether members of the press corps or Supreme Court justices. His enemies face the wrath of God, since in his mind he is both God and avenger. TV and online preachers are in awe of his bluntness. If only they had his power. All this does not sit well in Europe, accustomed as it is to secular politicians, having long ago set aside popes and monarchs. French President Emmanuel Macron has, so far, been the only leading European to vex this Sun King–like figure, others fearing further trade repercussions. Fortunately, a few diplomats have raised their voices, and they deserve credit. Among them is Sven Kühn von Burgsdorff, a German national and the former European Union representative to the Palestinian territories, no doubt a low-IQ individual, but, as one myself, I choose to reproduce his incisive words below. Remarking on recent events in the Middle East, this is what he had to say: “How can it serve Europe to be seen as a sidekick of an erratic, unreliable, and apparently megalomaniac U.S. president, or of a warmongering, annexationist Israeli prime minister. That cannot be in Europe’s interest, because it comes at the expense of relations with other parts of the world.” As Emmanuel Macron has repeatedly said, it’s time for Europe to grow up.

Older posts

Newer posts