June 20, 2026 | Rome, Italy
An oil painting of a lit candle.

Sight Unseen

A blind expat's musings on life, death, and the Trump era

119 posts and counting

My name is Christopher Winner. I am an American citizen who has lived in Europe, predominantly Rome, for nearly half a century, and I founded The American | In Italia in 2004. I also began a column titled “Area 51,” which exists to this day. But, in 2015, I was diagnosed with glaucoma and have gradually lost my sight. The thoughts and comments you read below are snippets of my thinking in these challenging times and are dictated to co-managing editor Leigh Smith. See also my personal website.

HAL revisited: I was among the few who watched the 1968 premiere of Stanley Kubrick’s “2001: A Space Odyssey” in Cinerama, a short-lived but mesmerizing technique that used three projectors operating simultaneously to display the entire canvas of the film on an amphitheatrically shaped screen measuring some fifty feet, floor to ceiling. Cinerama, for all its magnificence, took second place to the film’s star, an artificially intelligent supercomputer named HAL 9000, its voice dubbed by the Canadian actor Douglas Rain in flat, eerie tones. HAL is the soul of a vessel sent into distant space to investigate a Tower of Babel–like monolith on Earth’s moon (and, previously, in Africa at the dawn of humanity) that appears to take orders from its Jupiter counterpart. Though hundreds of postwar films and books touched on the inevitability of AI, HAL 9000 was unique, in essence a hyperintelligent supplementary human with a glowing red eye. At the time, some critics viewed HAL as a high-tech caricature, the brilliant machine made in man’s image, which, given human nature, would eventually turn against him. Ultimately undone by data it cannot fathom, HAL kills one of the two astronauts on board, forcing the second one to “disarm” it, to use Pope Leo’s word. My memory of HAL, a traumatic one for a boy, comes as the head of the American AI firm Anthropic has openly said that some new AI systems may soon have the menacing capacity to elude human control, HAL finally come true. He all but begs other AI firms to construct what he calls a brake pedal. I doubt he will succeed for the same reason HAL was made omnipotent, because superintelligence is thrilling, but as futurist Arthur C. Clarke — author of the 2001 series — knew, an AI door left too ajar can be symbolically and literally murderous, like a hormonally homicidal teen with an AK-47. The message is simple: Disarm now before HAL and its 21st-Century masters will not allow it.
Drop dead: In 1995, Yitzhak Rabin was shot dead by a right-wing Israeli student who considered the prime minister a traitor to his country for his direct dealings with the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and for helping to oversee the Oslo Accords that called for the creation of a Palestinian Authority that would tend to the needs of Palestinians in Gaza and the occupied West Bank. But after Rabin’s death, that bright, shining light was gradually snuffed out. The PLO was replaced by Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon, both supplied and abetted by Islamic Iran, and determined to provoke the Jewish state in any way possible. Today, Israel is ruled by Benjamin Netanyahu, a chameleon-like figure who at times resembles Hungary’s deposed Viktor Orbán. He leads Israel by virtue of a devil’s bargain since his governing partners seek to literally exterminate the region’s Palestinian presence, a position amplified a thousand times over after the 2023 Hamas massacre and hostage-taking. So far, however, the “mighty vengeance” generated by that atrocity is only partly complete, though Israel is determined to occupy the whole of Gaza, massively increase West Bank settlements, and take as much of Lebanon as it needs to offset the Hezbollah threat. Here is where problems begin. The American president wishes to rein in at least some of these ambitions so he can strike a peace deal with Iran, three-and-a-half months after he (alongside Israel) started a war whose true goal was to oust the Islamic regime and in so doing humble the two Hs. Netanyahu has so far mostly complied with his boss’ orders, thus enraging Israel’s dominant reactionaries, who are almost pathologically averse to the Palestinian people. The future is grim and, in some ways, ironically reminiscent of the infamous New York Daily News headline published when President Gerald Ford refused financial help to the downtrodden city. It read, “FORD TO CITY: DROP DEAD.” If Rabin were alive today, and still eager for regional peace, a similar headline might read “ISRAEL TO RABIN: DROP DEAD,” but that part has already been signed, sealed, and delivered.
Dead chivalry: Long ago, my parents instilled in me the values of chivalry, not those of a knight but of a gentleman. Over the decades, I struggled to explain their old-school wisdom. Recently, however, the world of sports did it for me. In the second round of the French Open, the Italian ace Jannik Sinner, on a 30-match winning streak, was pitted against a little-known Argentine named Juan Manuel Cerundolo in a second-round match. All believed the match would be a mere formality, and indeed that’s the way it went, with Sinner leading 5-1 in the third set after handily capturing the first two. Then, suddenly, for no apparent reason, Sinner began to wobble. So precarious were his movements that the umpire granted him a lengthy medical timeout. But the heat-depleted man who returned to play had lost all strength and mobility, and the Argentine, smelling blood, reeled off 18 of the final 20 points to take the match. Enter my chivalry. Based on the values my parents taught me, it was up to Cerundolo to resign, conceding to a visibly disabled foe competing on pride alone. Though such a gentlemanly act might actually have been possible a century ago when tennis was still an amateur sport, it was out of the question in an era in which winning defines all human endeavor. Consider that in World War I, stricken aviators often saluted adversaries before beginning their death spiral. In the year 2026, I can have no quarrel with the 24-year-old Cerundolo, but I know precisely what I would have done, chivalry whispering its lessons into my ear.
Caligula revisited: Germany’s National Socialist Party came to power in 1933 thanks to an unusually charismatic Austrian-born politician named Adolf Hitler who arrogantly promised not only to make his hobbled nation great again, but also to eliminate those who did not live up to his vision of Aryan purity, most of them Jews. In short order, he created a juggernaut military and a youth movement loyal only to him. No “lesser” European state, he proclaimed, would tell him what to do. Italy’s Benito Mussolini, Il Duce, found all this very thrilling indeed and ramped up copycat efforts so that his neo-Roman Fascism could join the gladiatorial party. News that the American president — who, despite his bluster, possesses none of Hitler’s organizational skills — will hold Colosseum-like cage fights on the White House lawn as part of his 80th birthday celebrations once again places his aberrant presidency on par with its 1930s precursors. No, America is not yet a Nazi or Fascist state, but its policies, including deportations, disdain for international law, and White supremacist tendencies, put it clearly in Hitler-Mussolini territory, as does an egomaniacal leader congenitally bereft of an operating moral compass. Hitler satiated his megalomaniacal side by staging a massive rally at Nuremberg, memorably captured by Leni Riefenstahl in her propaganda documentary “Triumph of the Will.” For America’s boss it is mixed-martial arts–style cage fights Caligula, no doubt, would have enjoyed. Next perhaps will come a luxury-box Colosseum, with lions in waiting, and what’s left of national dignity auctioned off to an ascendant China avidly aware of the Robert Graves masterpiece, The Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire.

Subtraction: “The Earth is hungry to subtract” was the opening line of a poem I wrote in the mid-1990s after a series of earthquakes in the Americas, Anatolia, and Eurasia. The poem’s speculation involved the opening of fissures that would come to swallow up the whole of humanity as an aging Earth grown tired of the burden of its surface dwellers. But the subtraction I failed to take into consideration is molecular, viral, the sickness not below but on the surface, between human beings. For fifty years now, new viral strains, most carried by birds, bats, rodents, and simians, have begun contaminating humanity’s vulnerable inner fluids. Imagine, please, a coronavirus-like epidemic of Ebola, whose latest strain is menacing several African nations. The result might be more like what was imagined in the postapocalyptic film “28 Days Later.” At a more existential level, consider as well that Earth is aging and by all accounts has already lived about half its projected lifespan, 5 billion years, a lifetime that will ultimately come to a quietly cold end after the sun becomes a white dwarf. Unless the inhabitants of Earth find and colonize a new home, they will vanish. In a time when many debate whether climate change is real — few choosing to study the fate of dinosaurs or to meditate on ancient ice ages — the reality that the planet itself is entirely mortal dawns only on astronomers. And yet the real tick-tock is not a social media platform, but the sound of actual time passing, in the end bringing my poem’s prophecy of subtraction to fruition.

A Game of Drones: The war in Ukraine has entered a new and perilous phase. No longer does Russia possess the undisputed upper hand. Over the past year, its frontline troops have lost significant ground in the east of the country, the territory Moscow most covets. Despite the loss of most of its American backing, Ukraine has made brilliant use of NATO and European Union support, which has supplied the cash and means to create an imposing drone fleet. Lately, Ukraine’s drone “drivers,” by now well-schooled in video war, have learned to penetrate deep into Russia, for the first time repeatedly targeting Moscow itself as well as nearby and vital oil refineries. All this has enraged one Vladimir Putin, who can now indirectly claim Russia is no longer solely being targeted by Kiev but also by loathed NATO nations. Now more than ever, Putin reserves the right not only to stage his own massive drone and missile reprisals but also to potentially strike Europe, with the Baltic states most likely in his crosshairs. According to the EU, Putin has already directed his expert hackers to do everything in their power to reprogram Ukrainian drones so they encroach on NATO airspace, while also stepping up provocative cyberattacks throughout the continent, part and parcel of the new warfare. Any combination of these circumstances could plunge Europe into a major East-West crisis. While many are cheering Ukraine’s remarkable drone skills, buyer beware. The anger of a wounded Putin could at any time turn irrational, all the more so as America and Israel delight in their lawless military might. It is, to say the least, a volatile time, one in which all eyes need to remain wide open and focused.

Meat storms: The Battle of Stalingrad changed the course of World War II. The unspeakably brutal confrontation between invading Nazi forces and the Red Army lasted seven months, from August 1942 through the following February, culminating in a German retreat that, coupled with America’s entry in the war, turned the tide against Axis powers. It is still celebrated in Russia as the crowning achievement of what remains known as the Great Patriotic War. Glossed over is that many Red Army soldiers had no wish to fight. No wonder, since temperatures were often below zero and they had little food. But any troops that showed reluctance or tarried were summarily killed by the NKVD, Moscow’s doctrine police. In effect, you were dead if you fought and dead if you did not. In all, Stalingrad would claim between one and two million dead. I mention this because the BBC reported recently that it had interviewed former Russian soldiers who had fled the Ukraine conflict and they had said Russian officers at the front casually executed those who refused to march into enemy gunfire, so-called meat storms. The BBC report had the aroma of disbelief and disgust. Clearly, no one had read up on Russia’s recent military behavior and the Army’s traditional disinterest in casualties. In a wartime era largely dominated by drones and precision strikes, Russia still plays by old-school rules. Death at the front is a norm, as it is for Ukrainian troops. Both sides still reside in a dimension of battlefield horror the West can no longer fathom. Since neither side has the soldiers to overrun the other, the slaughter persists. For anyone interested in the legacy of trench warfare, here is its modern sibling, further proof, if any was needed, that enlightened battlefields are a lie.

My “war years”: The tools of war thrilled me as a boy. In the very early 1960s, I assembled model ships and planes and immersed myself in the comic-book adventures of Johnny “Flying” Cloud, an American fighter ace who saw the shapes of his Navajo ancestors in the sky while shooting down German Messerschmitts. My idealized view of war and warriors was much like that of this president, though the toys he commands are not toys at all. These “war years,” as I called them, lasted roughly from ages eight to 12 and ended not long after I visited an American air base in Spain where the commanding general, a friend of my father’s, allowed me to sit in the cockpit of an F-104 Starfighter. That same American general later organized a visit to the National Archives in Washington, D.C., in which his friend, a retired colonel who had flown hundreds of wartime missions, took me to a room that, as I remember, contained bound volumes imprinted with the words Lost Crews. They contained dozens of 8x10 photos of stunningly young American aviators standing or kneeling beside their B-17 bombers. “They’re all gone, son,” said the colonel, “so when you think of your model planes, think of these boys, and hope it never needs to be that way again.” If only the colonel were still alive to take this adolescent president to the lost crews room and lock him in.

Chocolate tricks: On his maiden visit to Greenland, the icy Atlantic island the United States covets for what it calls “security reasons,” Jeff Landry, the American special envoy and also governor of the state of Louisiana, played Pied Piper. He met with Greenland’s youthful prime minister, Jens-Frederik Nielsen, again pitching the line that Greenland, a semi-autonomous province of Denmark, would be a much better place if run by an American real-estate tycoon–turned president. He then took to the streets of Nuuk, the island’s small capital, bearing chocolates for kids and a promise of more goodies if they ever made it to Baton Rouge, which somehow they would if only the island belonged to the USA. Dressed for his city promenade in combat camouflage, he was, in effect, playing the role of a benevolent and patronizing plantation owner eager to take over a neighbor’s cotton fields, by force if necessary. He even brought along his personal physician to support the White House claim that Greenland cannot take care of its sick. Mussolini and Hitler used similar strategies in Albania and Austria, offering symbolic gifts if these countries would only perceive the greater good borne by Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany. They resisted the pied pipering of that era and were invaded as a result. Sweets aside, Greenland now risks a similar fate. But more troubling perhaps is the inappropriate and condescending approach to which Washington seems wed. Regrettably, this president’s men have no historical memory. They cannot look back to a time when American troops, seen by most Europeans as liberators, handed out bushels of chocolate bars to eager children who swarmed their advancing tanks toward the end of World War II. In those days, Hershey barhandouts stood for American goodness and decency. No longer.

Welcome to Israel!” My mother was born into an affluent Warsaw family on Christmas Day 1921. When Nazi Germany invaded Poland in September 1939, her teenage life was turned on end. Her brother died fighting the Germans, her sister died after contracting typhus, and her father was detained by the Gestapo. In January 1940, she and her mother absconded to Rome using false papers. Only once did my mother speak of the three cruel months before her escape to Rome, an Axis “open city.” This came in 1978, after the election of a Polish pope brought her to tears. She told me that in the autumn of the Nazi invasion, her Warsaw district fell under the jurisdiction of an sadistic SS captain who from his jeep, using a megaphone, would shout at cowering civilians, “Welcome to the Reich. We are the masters here.” Many were arrested on the spot. Some were blindfolded and left to stumble before they were summarily executed. She never again spoke of that time, which she spent a lifetime hiding even from her closest friends. But now, some ninety years later, to my horror, I hear the same phrasing, this time spoken by a prominent Jewish government official. In a widely circulated video, national security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, one of several extreme right figures in the Israeli cabinet, is heard berating detained activists from a flotilla attempting to bring aid to Gaza’s dispossessed, something Israel forbids. “Welcome to Israel; we are the masters here,” he proudly tells his captives in Hebrew. (Some have suggested the word “masters” should be translated as “landlords,” but under the circumstances, it makes little difference.) Though his remarks were roundly criticized in Israel and in Europe, he was not — and this is significant — compelled to apologize, nor was he asked to resign. He is only 50 and therefore may have the luxury of forgetting history. The awful truth is that Jewish extremism and that of the Reich can overlap. I can only be glad that my Catholic mother, a true admirer of a free world headed by a decent America as well as an admirer of Israel, died decades before cockroaches and their ilk returned to blacken the political landscape.

Puppeteers: In separate arenas, the White House is again reverting to blackmail and bullying to achieve desired goals. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the son of Cuban emigrants and a native Spanish speaker, has told his kin that America has nothing to do with the island’s suffering, this despite a months-long naval blockade that has starved Cuba of both fuel and medical supplies. The Communist regime was to blame for any suffering, he said, and the blockade was simply exacerbating age-old problems that only a political upheaval could repair. To make its point, the United States issued an arrest warrant for 94-year-old Raul Castro, who with his brother, Fidel, and others brought down a U.S.-backed dictatorship in 1959. In Europe, the president himself has said he will withdraw thousands of troops from NATO member states to punish the alliance for failing to embrace his war on Iran, a war he started, and join in a military plan to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Amid this crisis-like uncertainty, Russia and Belarus just completed three days of opportunistic nuclear drills, of the kind that once would have put NATO on high alert. On the domestic front, the threat of license revocation has forced venerable network CBS to divorce Stephen Colbert, a popular late-night satirist who refused to relent in his criticism of the White House. More such heavy-handed censorship is likely to follow. In bare bones terms, this president cannot distinguish between right and wrong and, with Israel, disdains all international law, undoing the political and social contract that in another era would likely have led to massive Washington street protests. But no such protests are in the wings, in part because the post-9/11 era, with its color-coded terrorist alerts and its draconian Patriot Act, created a “be very afraid” ethos that made citizens reluctant to challenge presidential authority. This is no longer Make America Great Again, but America, reinvented to suit a puppeteer whose global show some may criticize but all defer to.

Beautiful endgame: The beautiful game as practiced by Pelé, Eusébio, Beckenbauer, Maradona, and others is now officially a relic. FIFA ended a more innocent era when it recently announced a Super Bowl–like musical extravaganza at halftime of the 2026 World Cup final to be played at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey, kowtowing to the now-global need for incessant stimulation. This new long break will, by its protracted nature, mar the diction and syntax of a wide-open game once played and filmed without commercial interruption. For years, American television sponsors had pressed for NFL-like breaks, but FIFA, still governed by purists, adamantly resisted. If advertisers required means to monetize the game, and what an ugly verb that is, they could use the fringes of television screens to do so. That began changing early this century, when teams, players, and stadiums began bowing to all manner of visible sponsorship. These days, some club players resemble Formula One drivers, ad logos stitched to every seam. More recently came the introduction of three-minute water breaks, allegedly to cool players on hot days but in fact another monetizing strategy since players of all nations had endured heat and rain since the game’s inception. In fairness, this is no longer Pelé’s world, one in which some players casually smoked at the half. Some of today’s players are millionaires many times over. Attention spans are now shorter, smartphones at all times revved up, so a Madonna at the half makes sense — as do outrageously high ticket prices. I once spoke to Italian star Giorgio Chinaglia, who in his waning years defected from Rome club Lazio to play alongside Pele in the short-lived 1970s North American Soccer League. What did he think of it all? “Fine,” he said, “but too much spectacle,” by which he meant cheerleaders and distracting fireworks. “We are here to play for those who love the game,” the beautiful game, part of whose once-naive heart is busily being carved out.