Sight Unseen
A blind expat's musings on life, death and the Trump era
My name is Christopher Winner. I am an American citizen who has lived in Europe, predominantly Rome, for nearly half a century, and I founded The American | In Italia in 2004. I also began a column titled “Area 51,” which exists to this day. But, in 2015, I was diagnosed with glaucoma and have gradually lost my sight. The thoughts and comments you read below are snippets of my thinking in these challenging times and are dictated to co-managing editor Leigh Smith. See also my personal website.
Child’s play: In 1920, the Women’s Christian Temperance Union and similar puritanical organizations received a providential assist from the United States Congress in the form of a constitutional amendment barring the production and distribution of alcoholic beverages. All this did, as is often the case, was create a plethora of subversions. The Italian and Irish mobs got to work creating thousands of speakeasies, some disguised as bingo parlors or literary salons. Many built their own stills and the word moonshine became a Roaring Twenties staple. Shipping lines invented binge-drinking “Cruises to Nowhere” in which liners spent a day or two outside U.S. territorial waters. The rich traveled to Cuba while the poor drank wood alcohol and went blind. In a word, Prohibition failed, and Franklin Roosevelt repealed it in 1933, giving a literally depressed nation a chance to again drown its sorrows, this time legally. Unsurprisingly, Alcoholics Anonymous came into being two years later. All this comes to mind when I read of legislation, some already in place, to keep under-16s off addictive social media platforms. While the idea has merit, I see stills and moonshine in the offing in the form of subterranean assistance to children who feel suddenly deprived, with unscrupulous hackers and tech companies playing the role of the mob. Bottom line, the digital genie is out of the gin bottle and, much as I’d like to, I can’t imagine a single way of putting it back in.
Azzuri Blues: In 2018, Italy failed to win a berth in the World Cup for the first time in the competition’s nearly century-old history, and the country was understandably shocked. Had Italy not won the cup four times, played in six finals, and appeared regularly in the quarter- and semifinal rounds? For a time, this was excused as an awful glitch, a hubris check. But Italy was then excluded from the 2022 and 2026 Cup, eliminated by mini-minnows North Macedonia and Bosnia. Glitch was gone, and shame took center stage. So what’s gone wrong? The reality is that Italy’s vivaio, or farm system, has run dry. While kids between six and 16 still play in the streets and parks, some have turned to soccer esports and the like for amusement.
Raw talent is now harder to spot. Italian league clubs have made matters worse by coming to depend on mercenary talent from outside Italy. Such talent is cheaper and often better. Finally, unlike France, England, and Germany, Italy has no homegrown Black talent, cutting it out of the powerful African youth market. Few African families choose to settle in Italy, still a deeply racist nation with few faces of color in the public arena. These realities, when bookended, can make for an impoverishment of talent, with no American college-style pipeline to come to the rescue. No one brilliant manager can cure this. The failure is cultural as well as sporting. When Italy last won, in 2006 against France, the nation came to a proud standstill. But names like Zoff, Rossi, Baggio, and Maldini are gone with the wind, which means a great deal of time may pass before Italian players again hoist a World Cup trophy.
Israel 2.0: It is an unfortunate accident of history that the United States and Israel, inseparable allies, would at the same time be led by governments of the extreme right, each inclined toward 1930s militarism. The campaign against Iran was only in part motivated by fears that Islamic nation was close to developing a nuclear weapon. The second component, just as vital, was to sever the umbilical cord between Tehran and its major terrorist proxies, Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza. This Israeli leadership is unlike its more open-minded predecessors. It seeks not only full control of Gaza, but also as much of Lebanon as it can secure, both stepping stones toward a vibrant Greater Israel, no Palestinian state in the mix. Nor are civilian casualties of any special concern. Here is Israel’s version of Manifest Destiny, a concept to which the American president can relate. An expanded and unimpeded Jewish state dealing freely with its rich Arab neighbors (Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, and Kuwait, among others) would represent an unrivaled commercial and political juggernaut. For this reason it has no intention of curbing its military moves in Lebanon, which makes enduring peace with Iran hard to imagine. These times have the flavor of a Judeo-Christian jihad, though both Israel and the U.S. would find such a parallel profoundly objectionable. Yet it is, without doubt, one extremism pitted against another, with the biblical nation-builders holding the upper hand.